Stacking the Sky: Why VLEO, MEO, GEO and HAPS Must Work Together
- Bridge Connect

- Sep 22
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 27
Introduction: From Orbit Wars to Orbit Stacks
The industry has spent the last decade debating whether LEO would kill GEO, whether HAPS are viable, and whether we need satellites at all in a fibre-first world. The truth in 2025 is more nuanced: no single orbit can solve every coverage, capacity, and cost problem.
Instead, the future of connectivity will be multi-layered — stacking stratospheric platforms, VLEO, MEO and GEO to deliver a network that is:
Resilient: no single point of failure.
Cost-optimised: high-capacity where needed, low-cost coverage where possible.
Latency-aware: pushing time-sensitive workloads to the edge.
Regulatory-compliant: distributing risk across spectrum regimes and ITU filings.
Boards must think about the sky as a portfolio, not a monolithic bet. This blog explains how the layers fit together and provides hard data on altitudes, link budgets, coverage footprints, and deployment times.
1. The Four Layers at a Glance
Layer | Typical Altitude | Coverage Footprint | Latency (1-way) | FSPL @ 2 GHz | Lifetime / Refresh | Example Players |
HAPS | 18–22 km | 100–200 km diameter | ~1–2 ms | ~118 dB | 7–30 day sorties | SoftBank HAPSMobile, Airbus Zephyr |
VLEO | 300–350 km | ~500 km diameter | 20–30 ms | ~148 dB | 2–5 years | Starlink Gen3 (planned), ESA Skimsat |
MEO | 8,000 km | ~3,000 km diameter | 120–150 ms | ~170 dB | 7–10 years | SES O3b mPOWER |
GEO | 35,786 km | Hemisphere | 240+ ms | ~195 dB | 12–15 years | Viasat, Intelsat |
Takeaway: Each layer offers a different performance–cost trade-off. Latency and FSPL improve dramatically as you move lower, but so do refresh rates and constellation size requirements.

2. Why We Need All Four Layers
HAPS — The Rapid Response Layer
HAPS can be airborne in days, making them ideal for:
Disaster response (floods, earthquakes).
Temporary event coverage (festivals, pilgrimages).
Sovereign-controlled “on demand” capacity for governments.
They can be parked over a region, beamforming LTE/5G or NTN service with near-zero latency. But they are operationally intense — sorties must be planned, aircraft maintained, and regulatory permissions obtained.
VLEO — The Low-Latency Workhorse
VLEO offers:
Excellent link budgets (3–4 dB better than mid-LEO at 550 km).
Low latency (<30 ms) suitable for gaming, real-time control, and edge services.
Natural debris mitigation: orbits are self-cleaning, reducing space risk.
Downside: satellites need constant drag compensation and are refreshed every few years — so boards must model constellation OPEX like a subscription.
MEO — The High-Throughput Trunk
MEO is a sweet spot for:
High-capacity enterprise backhaul.
Connectivity for maritime and aero markets.
Consistent global coverage with fewer satellites than LEO.
SES O3b mPOWER has proven MEO’s viability for cloud connectivity. Latency (~130 ms) is fine for video streaming, less so for real-time gaming.
GEO — The Broadcast Bedrock
GEO remains king for:
Software updates, TV distribution, wide-area IoT.
Lowest cost per coverage area.
Very long design life (12–15 years), low constellation churn.
But GEO can’t solve the latency problem — so it must be paired with lower layers for interactive services.
3. Comparative Performance Metrics
Latency & Coverage
Layer | Round-Trip Latency | Satellites / Platforms Needed for Global Coverage |
HAPS | <5 ms | Not global — local/regional only |
VLEO | 40–60 ms | 10,000–15,000+ (dense shells) |
MEO | 250–300 ms | 10–20 (medium inclination planes) |
GEO | 500–600 ms | 3 (equatorial) |
Deployment Speed & Flexibility
Layer | Time-to-Deploy | Scalability | Notes |
HAPS | Days to weeks | Highly scalable regionally | Airspace clearance is gating factor |
VLEO | Months to years | Scales in shells/planes | Requires high launch cadence |
MEO | Years | Constellation-level | Long satellite build cycles |
GEO | Years | One-by-one launches | Longest lead times, lowest flexibility |
Link Budget Implications
Layer | FSPL (2 GHz) | EIRP Required for Handset Link | Ground Terminal Size |
HAPS | ~118 dB | <20 dBm | Phone’s internal antenna |
VLEO | ~148 dB | ~28–30 dBW per satellite | Small ESA payload |
MEO | ~170 dB | 40+ dBW | Larger sat antennas |
GEO | ~195 dB | 50+ dBW | Consumer broadband needs dish |
4. Hybrid Deployment Example: Disaster Recovery
Imagine a major hurricane knocks out fibre and cell towers:
Day 1: HAPS launched and positioned, providing 5G coverage for emergency responders.
Day 2: VLEO satellites backhaul voice and data for hospitals and government command posts.
Day 3+: GEO broadcasts mass evacuation info to the entire affected region.
Weeks later: MEO provides trunk capacity for temporary networks until fibre is restored.
This layered playbook reduces recovery time from weeks to days.
5. The Orchestration Challenge
To make the stack work, you need:
Seamless handover protocols (3GPP Rel-17/18 NTN handover, beam switching).
Spectrum coordination: MSS vs FSS, Ka vs S-band coexistence, avoiding interference.
AI-driven routing: Steering traffic by cost, latency, and SLA target automatically.
Procurement teams must ensure vendors support multi-orbit orchestration rather than siloed networks.
6. Business & Regulatory Implications
Boards should think about:
Capex diversification: Invest across layers to avoid a single-orbit dependency.
Spectrum strategy: Secure MSS and NTN bands early — they are appreciating assets.
Resilience KPIs: Define metrics for uptime, disaster coverage, and latency SLAs.
ESG profile: VLEO’s self-cleaning orbits and HAPS’s solar power reduce space debris and carbon footprint.
7. Board-Level “So-What”
Decision Area | Recommended Board Action |
Coverage Strategy | Approve a multi-layer architecture strategy, not a single-orbit bet |
Procurement | Mandate vendor neutrality and support for multi-orbit orchestration |
Risk Management | Build regulatory heatmaps for MSS/FSS, HAPS flight corridors |
Investment Planning | Budget for ongoing VLEO replenishment and HAPS sortie ops |
Resilience Planning | Include HAPS + VLEO in business continuity planning |
Conclusion: The Sky Is Not Flat — and Neither Should Your Strategy Be
The future is not GEO or LEO. It is GEO and VLEO and MEO and HAPS — a stacked sky delivering resilience, low latency, and cost efficiency.
Boards that treat orbital layers as a portfolio can:
Achieve superior customer experience,
Spread regulatory and capex risk,
And unlock new revenue streams (disaster recovery SLAs, roaming-as-a-service).
This is not an engineering hobby — it’s a strategic design choice for the next decade of digital infrastructure.
