top of page

Stacking the Sky: Why VLEO, MEO, GEO and HAPS Must Work Together

  • Writer: Bridge Connect
    Bridge Connect
  • Sep 22
  • 4 min read

Updated: Oct 27

Introduction: From Orbit Wars to Orbit Stacks

The industry has spent the last decade debating whether LEO would kill GEO, whether HAPS are viable, and whether we need satellites at all in a fibre-first world. The truth in 2025 is more nuanced: no single orbit can solve every coverage, capacity, and cost problem.


Instead, the future of connectivity will be multi-layered — stacking stratospheric platforms, VLEO, MEO and GEO to deliver a network that is:

  • Resilient: no single point of failure.

  • Cost-optimised: high-capacity where needed, low-cost coverage where possible.

  • Latency-aware: pushing time-sensitive workloads to the edge.

  • Regulatory-compliant: distributing risk across spectrum regimes and ITU filings.


Boards must think about the sky as a portfolio, not a monolithic bet. This blog explains how the layers fit together and provides hard data on altitudes, link budgets, coverage footprints, and deployment times.


1. The Four Layers at a Glance

Layer

Typical Altitude

Coverage Footprint

Latency (1-way)

FSPL @ 2 GHz

Lifetime / Refresh

Example Players

HAPS

18–22 km

100–200 km diameter

~1–2 ms

~118 dB

7–30 day sorties

SoftBank HAPSMobile, Airbus Zephyr

VLEO

300–350 km

~500 km diameter

20–30 ms

~148 dB

2–5 years

Starlink Gen3 (planned), ESA Skimsat

MEO

8,000 km

~3,000 km diameter

120–150 ms

~170 dB

7–10 years

SES O3b mPOWER

GEO

35,786 km

Hemisphere

240+ ms

~195 dB

12–15 years

Viasat, Intelsat


Takeaway: Each layer offers a different performance–cost trade-off. Latency and FSPL improve dramatically as you move lower, but so do refresh rates and constellation size requirements.


ree



2. Why We Need All Four Layers


HAPS — The Rapid Response Layer

HAPS can be airborne in days, making them ideal for:

  • Disaster response (floods, earthquakes).

  • Temporary event coverage (festivals, pilgrimages).

  • Sovereign-controlled “on demand” capacity for governments.

They can be parked over a region, beamforming LTE/5G or NTN service with near-zero latency. But they are operationally intense — sorties must be planned, aircraft maintained, and regulatory permissions obtained.


VLEO — The Low-Latency Workhorse

VLEO offers:

  • Excellent link budgets (3–4 dB better than mid-LEO at 550 km).

  • Low latency (<30 ms) suitable for gaming, real-time control, and edge services.

  • Natural debris mitigation: orbits are self-cleaning, reducing space risk.

Downside: satellites need constant drag compensation and are refreshed every few years — so boards must model constellation OPEX like a subscription.


MEO — The High-Throughput Trunk

MEO is a sweet spot for:

  • High-capacity enterprise backhaul.

  • Connectivity for maritime and aero markets.

  • Consistent global coverage with fewer satellites than LEO.

SES O3b mPOWER has proven MEO’s viability for cloud connectivity. Latency (~130 ms) is fine for video streaming, less so for real-time gaming.


GEO — The Broadcast Bedrock

GEO remains king for:

  • Software updates, TV distribution, wide-area IoT.

  • Lowest cost per coverage area.

  • Very long design life (12–15 years), low constellation churn.

But GEO can’t solve the latency problem — so it must be paired with lower layers for interactive services.


3. Comparative Performance Metrics

Latency & Coverage

Layer

Round-Trip Latency

Satellites / Platforms Needed for Global Coverage

HAPS

<5 ms

Not global — local/regional only

VLEO

40–60 ms

10,000–15,000+ (dense shells)

MEO

250–300 ms

10–20 (medium inclination planes)

GEO

500–600 ms

3 (equatorial)

Deployment Speed & Flexibility

Layer

Time-to-Deploy

Scalability

Notes

HAPS

Days to weeks

Highly scalable regionally

Airspace clearance is gating factor

VLEO

Months to years

Scales in shells/planes

Requires high launch cadence

MEO

Years

Constellation-level

Long satellite build cycles

GEO

Years

One-by-one launches

Longest lead times, lowest flexibility

Link Budget Implications

Layer

FSPL (2 GHz)

EIRP Required for Handset Link

Ground Terminal Size

HAPS

~118 dB

<20 dBm

Phone’s internal antenna

VLEO

~148 dB

~28–30 dBW per satellite

Small ESA payload

MEO

~170 dB

40+ dBW

Larger sat antennas

GEO

~195 dB

50+ dBW

Consumer broadband needs dish


4. Hybrid Deployment Example: Disaster Recovery

Imagine a major hurricane knocks out fibre and cell towers:

  1. Day 1: HAPS launched and positioned, providing 5G coverage for emergency responders.

  2. Day 2: VLEO satellites backhaul voice and data for hospitals and government command posts.

  3. Day 3+: GEO broadcasts mass evacuation info to the entire affected region.

  4. Weeks later: MEO provides trunk capacity for temporary networks until fibre is restored.

This layered playbook reduces recovery time from weeks to days.


5. The Orchestration Challenge

To make the stack work, you need:

  • Seamless handover protocols (3GPP Rel-17/18 NTN handover, beam switching).

  • Spectrum coordination: MSS vs FSS, Ka vs S-band coexistence, avoiding interference.

  • AI-driven routing: Steering traffic by cost, latency, and SLA target automatically.

Procurement teams must ensure vendors support multi-orbit orchestration rather than siloed networks.


6. Business & Regulatory Implications

Boards should think about:

  • Capex diversification: Invest across layers to avoid a single-orbit dependency.

  • Spectrum strategy: Secure MSS and NTN bands early — they are appreciating assets.

  • Resilience KPIs: Define metrics for uptime, disaster coverage, and latency SLAs.

  • ESG profile: VLEO’s self-cleaning orbits and HAPS’s solar power reduce space debris and carbon footprint.


7. Board-Level “So-What”

Decision Area

Recommended Board Action

Coverage Strategy

Approve a multi-layer architecture strategy, not a single-orbit bet

Procurement

Mandate vendor neutrality and support for multi-orbit orchestration

Risk Management

Build regulatory heatmaps for MSS/FSS, HAPS flight corridors

Investment Planning

Budget for ongoing VLEO replenishment and HAPS sortie ops

Resilience Planning

Include HAPS + VLEO in business continuity planning


Conclusion: The Sky Is Not Flat — and Neither Should Your Strategy Be

The future is not GEO or LEO. It is GEO and VLEO and MEO and HAPS — a stacked sky delivering resilience, low latency, and cost efficiency.

Boards that treat orbital layers as a portfolio can:

  • Achieve superior customer experience,

  • Spread regulatory and capex risk,

  • And unlock new revenue streams (disaster recovery SLAs, roaming-as-a-service).

This is not an engineering hobby — it’s a strategic design choice for the next decade of digital infrastructure.

Related Posts

See All
bottom of page