top of page

Global Tech Spending Cuts – When Tariffs Rewrite the Innovation Agenda

  • Writer: Bridge Connect
    Bridge Connect
  • Aug 28
  • 2 min read

Introduction: The $6 Trillion Ceiling

Global tech spending was forecast to surpass $6 trillion in 2025. That forecast has now been cut. The reasons: tariffs, trade fragmentation, and geopolitical instability. What boards must understand is that this is not just an accounting revision - it is a signal of how innovation pipelines will be disrupted.


1. The Tariff Effect

  • U.S.– China trade measures: hardware imports face new duties, raising costs for AI chips, networking equipment, and cloud servers.

  • Ripple Impact: Telcos and enterprises in Asia, Africa, and Europe see supply chain price inflation.

  • Corporate Response: CFOs push for capex deferrals, CIOs cut innovation budgets.


"Tariffs are the new R&D tax -hidden in plain sight, reshaping corporate innovation strategies."


2. Short-Termism Takes Hold

Boards under pressure shift from transformative projects (AI, edge, 6G pilots) toward incremental efficiencies:

  • Delaying greenfield networks.

  • Pausing large-scale migration to post-quantum cryptography.

  • Prioritising cybersecurity patches over innovation.


3. Winners in a Downturn

  • Cloud cost optimisers and AI-powered FinOps firms.

  • Domestic suppliers who can substitute for tariff-hit imports.

  • Geopolitically neutral vendors (Nordic software firms, Indian SI companies).


4. Losers in a Tariff-Constrained World

  • Hardware OEMs reliant on Chinese fabs or U.S. chipsets.

  • Global system integrators caught between competing standards.

  • Start-ups reliant on cross-border VC funding.


5. Strategic Takeaways

  • Boards should model innovation drought scenarios: what happens if R&D budgets are cut 20–30% over three years?

  • Assess supply chain fragility: where does your capex depend on tariff-exposed components?

  • Rethink innovation metrics: resilience and compliance may matter more than bleeding-edge pilots.


Conclusion

Q4 2025’s headlines will frame this as a downturn. Boards should frame it differently: as the re-writing of the global innovation map. Those who anticipate the tariff drag will find advantage in resilience.

bottom of page